Large disjoint subgraphs with the same order and size
نویسندگان
چکیده
For a graph G let f(G) be the largest integer k so that there are two vertex-disjoint subgraphs of G, each with k vertices, and that induce the same number of edges. Clearly f(G) ≤ bn/2c but this is not always achievable. Our main result is that for any fixed α > 0, if G has n vertices and at most n2−α edges then f(G) = n/2 − o(n), which is asymptotically optimal. The proof also yields a polynomial time randomized algorithm. More generally, let t be a fixed nonnegative integer and let H be a fixed graph. Let fH(G, t) be the largest integer k so that there are two k-vertex subgraphs of G having at most t vertices in common, that induce the same number of copies of H. We prove that if H has r vertices then fH(G, t) = Ω(n1−(2r−1)/(2r+2t+1)). In particular, there are two subgraphs of the same order Ω(n1/2+1/(8r−2)) that induce the same number of copies of H and that have no copy of H in common.
منابع مشابه
TOTAL DOMINATION POLYNOMIAL OF GRAPHS FROM PRIMARY SUBGRAPHS
Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple graph of order $n$. The total dominating set is a subset $D$ of $V$ that every vertex of $V$ is adjacent to some vertices of $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is equal to minimum cardinality of total dominating set in $G$ and denoted by $gamma_t(G)$. The total domination polynomial of $G$ is the polynomial $D_t(G,x)=sum d_t(G,i)$, where $d_t(G,i)$ is the numbe...
متن کاملRepetitions in Graphs and Sequences
The existence of unavoidable repeated substructures is a known phenomenon implied by the pigeonhole principle and its generalizations. A fundamental problem is to determine the largest size of a repeated substructure in any combinatorial structure from a given class. The strongest notion of repetition is a pair of isomorphic substructures, such as a pair of vertexdisjoint or edge-disjoint isomo...
متن کاملDisjoint induced subgraphs of the same order and size
For a graph G, let f(G) be the largest integer k such that there are two vertex-disjoint subgraphs of G each on k vertices, both inducing the same number of edges. We prove that f(G) ≥ n/2 − o(n) for every graph G on n vertices. This answers a question of Caro and Yuster.
متن کاملConditions for families of disjoint k-connected subgraphs in a graph
In [Many disjoint dense subgraphs versus large k-connected subgraphs in large graphs with given edge density, Discrete Math. 309 (2009), 997–1000.], Böhme and Kostochka showed that every large enough graph with sufficient edge density contains either a kconnected subgraph of order at least r or a family of r vertex-disjoint k-connected subgraphs. Motivated by this, in this note we explore the l...
متن کاملDistinct edge geodetic decomposition in graphs
Let G=(V,E) be a simple connected graph of order p and size q. A decomposition of a graph G is a collection π of edge-disjoint subgraphs G_1,G_2,…,G_n of G such that every edge of G belongs to exactly one G_i,(1≤i ≤n). The decomposition 〖π={G〗_1,G_2,…,G_n} of a connected graph G is said to be a distinct edge geodetic decomposition if g_1 (G_i )≠g_1 (G_j ),(1≤i≠j≤n). The maximum cardinality of π...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Eur. J. Comb.
دوره 30 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009